Your recruitment tech stack is almost certainly costing you more than it should - and protecting you less than you think.

There is no catch. We offer the review free because we only earn the right to work with you if it's genuinely useful - that's the entire model. The review, the written report, the vendor sourcing, and the recommendations debrief are all completely free. If the findings create a natural conversation about whether we're the right fit to help solve what we find, great. If not, the report is still yours to keep and act on however you choose.

Honestly - yes, if the review finds problems and you want help fixing them, we'd love to work with you. But there's no obligation attached to the review itself. The written report is yours to keep regardless of what you decide. We only earn the right to a commercial conversation if the review is genuinely useful to you. That's the only way this model works, so it's in our interest to make it worth your time.

Most organisations we review already have IT support - but IT support is not the same as recruitment technology strategy. Your IT provider handles infrastructure. Nobody in that relationship is looking at whether your recruitment tech stack makes commercial sense. Those are two entirely different things. We focus specifically on what your IT company isn't looking at - ATS/CRM fit, tool integration, licence overspend, recruitment-specific cyber exposure, and whether your tech is keeping pace with how the market is moving.

That's the best position to review from - no pressure, no urgency, just clarity. The question worth asking is when someone last looked at it independently to confirm that. If the review comes back clean, you've got a written record of it. If it finds something, you've got a roadmap before it becomes a problem. Either way you come out better informed than when you went in.

Mid-contract is actually the ideal time. You've got runway to make decisions without being under pressure. The review maps what to renegotiate before renewal, what to retire when the contract ends, and what's worth keeping. Going into a renewal without that picture is how teams end up locked into the wrong tools for another two or three years.

Yes. The review is not about one platform. It looks at how your whole recruitment environment works together - ATS, CRM, sourcing, job boards, LinkedIn, Microsoft, telephony, automation, reporting, security, and workflow.

That's exactly the size where the review tends to find the most. Twenty people with CRM, telephony, Microsoft, and job board subscriptions can easily be spending £80,000-£120,000 a year on technology - often without a clear picture of whether it's working. One of our case studies involved a 25-person firm that saved £30,000-£40,000 a year from the findings.

One 30-minute Teams call with you. That's it. No consultant time, no internal project, no forms to fill in beforehand. We do the analysis after the call and come back to you with the written report. Your team won't know it's happening.

The difference here is the report belongs to you regardless of what happens next. We don't hold the findings back behind a commercial conversation or drip-feed recommendations to keep you engaged. You get everything we find, in writing, in one document - and you can act on it with us, with someone else, or entirely on your own. We have no interest in producing a report that isn't useful. It's the only thing that earns us the right to a follow-up conversation.

We cap the number of reviews each month because each one is manually reviewed by our team. When we hit capacity, new requests go on a waiting list. If you want a slot this month, now is the time to book.