Your tech stack is almost certainly costing you more than it should - and protecting you less than you think.

There is no catch. We offer the audit free because we only earn the right to work with you if it's genuinely useful - that's the entire model. The audit, the written report, the vendor sourcing, and the recommendations debrief are all completely free. If the findings create a natural conversation about whether we're the right fit to help solve what we find, great. If not, the report is still yours to keep and act on however you choose.

Honestly - yes, if the audit finds problems and you want help fixing them, we'd love to work with you. But there's no obligation attached to the audit itself. The written report is yours to keep regardless of what you decide. We only earn the right to a commercial conversation if the audit is genuinely useful to you. That's the only way this model works, so it's in our interest to make it worth your time.

Almost every agency we audit already has one - and it still makes sense. Your IT provider handles infrastructure. Nobody in that relationship is looking at whether your recruitment tech stack makes commercial sense. Those are two entirely different things. We focus specifically on what your IT company isn't looking at - CRM fit, tool integration, licence overspend, recruitment-specific cyber exposure, and whether your tech is keeping pace with how the market is moving.

That's the best position to audit from - no pressure, no urgency, just clarity. The question worth asking is when someone last looked at it independently to confirm that. If the audit comes back clean, you've got a written record of it. If it finds something, you've got a roadmap before it becomes a problem. Either way you come out better informed than when you went in.

Mid-contract is actually the ideal time. You've got runway to make decisions without being under pressure. The audit maps what to renegotiate before renewal, what to retire when the contract ends, and what's worth keeping. Going into a renewal without that picture is how agencies end up locked into the wrong tools for another two or three years.

Absolutely. The audit isn't about your CRM specifically - it's about your whole technology environment and how everything works together. The more useful questions are usually around what sits around the CRM: how calls are logged, how data flows between systems, whether integrations are set up correctly, and whether licences are right-sized.

That's exactly the size where the audit tends to find the most. Twenty people with CRM, telephony, Microsoft, and job board subscriptions can easily be spending £80,000–£120,000 a year on technology - often without a clear picture of whether it's working. One of our case studies involved a 25-person firm that saved £30,000–£40,000 a year from the findings.

One 30-minute Teams call with you. That's it. No consultant time, no internal project, no forms to fill in beforehand. We do the analysis after the call and come back to you with the written report. Your team won't know it's happening.

The difference here is the report belongs to you regardless of what happens next. We don't hold the findings back behind a commercial conversation or drip-feed recommendations to keep you engaged. You get everything we find, in writing, in one document - and you can act on it with us, with someone else, or entirely on your own. We have no interest in producing a report that isn't useful. It's the only thing that earns us the right to a follow-up conversation.

We cap the number of audits each month because each one is manually reviewed by our team. When we hit capacity, new requests go on a waiting list. If you want a slot this month, now is the time to book.